Somewhere between my third iced coffee and a video of a naked man levitating out of a giant saucer of mice and milk, I realized that irony is dead.
Not because sincerity is making a comeback (or, as Timothée Chalamet wants us to believe, because trying hard is cool again), but because content on the internet has gotten so absurd that it’s transcended the layer of meaning where irony and sincerity operate.
Let me tell you about what I saw this morning: a man biting the head off a parakeet as it turned to cake between its teeth. A woman posing seductively atop empty beer bottles at the base of an overflowing trashcan. A grotesque, wrinkled, man-dog hybrid. At times, these videos made me laugh through the sheer force of their supreme weirdness, but most sent me into a visceral, cringing state of shock, like what the fuck did I just watch?
I’ve been seeing more of this reality-bending content lately. In its mutant excess, it holds up a mirror to the media environment that produced it—where content is served up in bite-sized pieces, severed from any context, and maximum intensity is algorithmically-rewarded. This environment exerts a kind of evolutionary pressure on content to stand out and remain context-free, since there’s no room to establish it on an algorithmic feed. Disorientation through emotional intensity becomes the optimal strategy.
In parallel, generative AI has removed the last remaining barriers to the production of images, enabling the creation of content that is uncanny, emotionally charged, and devoid of meaning. Bodies mutate into food then back into bodies. Faces morph through human, animal, and spaghetti-monster variations over the course of a few seconds.
We have entered the post-legible internet, where content still communicates, just not through meaning. It’s not totally illegible—if it were, it wouldn’t trigger a reaction—but it’s not legible either, because there’s nothing to understand. It occupies a strange, third zone that bypasses reasoning altogether.
I’ve been calling this condition—in which content no longer transmits meaning but instead communicates affect—post-legibility. It doesn’t tell you anything, it does something to you.
Since irony operates by subverting meaning (which requires meaning to exist in the first place), it dies in post-legible vibe-space. Content zaps straight into the brain, triggering laughter, shock, disgust, or confusion, rather than taking the long road there via reason and interpretation.
The Italian Brainrot Animals are perhaps the most notable recent example of this phenomenon, though low on the intensity scale. In early 2025, the AI-generated freak-critters became a global sensation precisely because their meaninglessness, coupled with their playful emotional charge, made them so universally appealing (post-legible content usually takes on the form of brainrot, but brainrot is a visual aesthetic while post-legibility describes a logic of transmission).
Lack of depth online is nothing new, of course. Since social media’s early days, what’s gone viral has often prioritized emotional resonance over explicit meaning. Videos like Badgers, Salad Fingers, and Too Many Cooks were spiritual predecessors to today’s post-legible content streams. But as absurd as they were, these early examples still had stable characters and unfolded within internally consistent worlds, even if they differed from our own.
Legibility has since unraveled further, mutating, with the help of AI, into more acutely uncanny states. Much of today’s post-legible content avoids coherence at all costs, shunning narrative altogether, embracing fluid, morphing characters, and even extending this destabilization into the physical laws of the worlds it constructs.
The more incomprehensible, the more emotionally potent, the more spreadable. Social media already runs on this logic, virality governed less by sense than sensation. Post-legible content takes this to its logical extreme. There are moments when you can start to see the present take the shape of the future. This one feels like getting hit in the face by debris from the eventual implosion of the internet’s current incarnation, blown backward in time.





This makes me think of surrealism, but without the call to our unconscious. It suggests that the concept of a shared unconscious metanarrative no longer exists. That could in itself be a good thing
As Terrence McKenna prophesized around the 1980's, "technology will become more like drugs and drugs will become more like technology". The first part of his statement is becoming increasingly true. The addictiveness has been here for a while at this point, but the more psychedelic reality bending aspect has finally hit us. Technology is becoming so drug-like that what's left is pure impact on the senses. There is no inherent meaning, just some change in consciousness.
Great short article, I'll subscribe